Gecko [ www.finalhopeacademy.com ]

Name	Size	Permission
README	718 B	-rw-r--r--
draft-behera-ldap-password-pol...	83.67 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-chu-ldap-csn-xx.txt	13.56 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-chu-ldap-ldapi-xx.txt	15.16 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-chu-ldap-xordered-xx.txt	20.8 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-haripriya-dynamicgroup-x...	36.04 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-howard-rfc2307bis-xx.txt	51.45 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-x...	82.41 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-...	178.83 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-ietf-ldapext-ldapv3-dupe...	19.12 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-ietf-ldapext-ldapv3-vlv-...	34.45 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-ietf-ldapext-locate-xx.t...	14.15 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-joslin-config-schema-xx....	63.69 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-lachman-laser-ldap-mail-...	29.87 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-xx.t...	17.55 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-xx.txt	96.02 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-legg-ldap-admin-xx.txt	14.92 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-legg-ldap-transfer-xx.tx...	23.25 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-masarati-ldap-deref-xx.t...	15.07 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-masarati-ldap-whatfailed...	12.59 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-sermersheim-ldap-chainin...	15.45 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-sermersheim-ldap-csn-xx....	21.56 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-sermersheim-ldap-distpro...	82.27 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-sermersheim-ldap-subordi...	10.83 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-wahl-ldap-session-xx.txt	34.3 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-zeilenga-ldap-c-api-conc...	26.72 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-zeilenga-ldap-dontusecop...	10.03 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-zeilenga-ldap-noop-xx.tx...	11.44 KB	-rw-r--r--
draft-zeilenga-ldap-relax.txt	22.44 KB	-rw-r--r--

Code Editor : draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-xx.txt

INTERNET-DRAFT                                                   S. Legg
draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-03.txt                     Adacel Technologies
Intended Category: Standards Track                         June 16, 2004

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
                     Access Control Administration

Status of this Memo

This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
   all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

Distribution of this document is unlimited.  Comments should be sent
   to the author.

This Internet-Draft expires on 16 December 2004.

Abstract

This document adapts the X.500 directory administrative model, as it
   pertains to access control administration, for use by the Lightweight
   Directory Access Protocol.  The administrative model partitions the
   Directory Information Tree for various aspects of directory data
   administration, e.g., subschema, access control and collective
   attributes.  This document provides the particular definitions that
   support access control administration, but does not define a
   particular access control scheme.

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 1]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

Table of Contents

1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
   2.  Conventions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
   3.  Access Control Administrative Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   4.  Access Control Scheme Indication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   5.  Access Control Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   6.  Access Control Subentries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   7.  Applicable Access Control Information. . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   8.  Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
   9.  Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   10. IANA Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       11.1.  Normative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       11.2.  Informative References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7

1.  Introduction

This document adapts the X.500 directory administrative model [X501],
   as it pertains to access control administration, for use by the
   Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC3377].

The administrative model [ADMIN] partitions the Directory Information
   Tree (DIT) for various aspects of directory data administration,
   e.g., subschema, access control and collective attributes.  The parts
   of the administrative model that apply to every aspect of directory
   data administration are described in [ADMIN].  This document
   describes the administrative framework for access control.

An access control scheme describes the means by which access to
   directory information, and potentially to access rights themselves,
   may be controlled.  This document describes the framework for
   employing access control schemes but does not define a particular
   access control scheme.  Two access control schemes known as Basic
   Access Control and Simplified Access Control are defined by [BAC].
   Other access control schemes may be defined by other documents.

This document is derived from, and duplicates substantial portions
   of, Sections 4 and 8 of X.501 [X501].

2.  Conventions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and  "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119
   [RFC2119].

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 2]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

Schema definitions are provided using LDAP description formats
   [RFC2252].  Note that the LDAP descriptions have been rendered with
   additional white-space and line breaks for the sake of readability.

3.  Access Control Administrative Areas

The specific administrative area [ADMIN] for access control is termed
   an Access Control Specific Area (ACSA).  The root of the ACSA is
   termed an Access Control Specific Point (ACSP) and is represented in
   the DIT by an administrative entry [ADMIN] which includes
   accessControlSpecificArea as a value of its administrativeRole
   operational attribute [SUBENTRY].

An ACSA MAY be partitioned into subtrees termed inner administrative
   areas [ADMIN].  Each such inner area is termed an Access Control
   Inner Area (ACIA).  The root of the ACIA is termed an Access Control
   Inner Point (ACIP) and is represented in the DIT by an administrative
   entry which includes accessControlInnerArea as a value of its
   administrativeRole operational attribute.

An administrative entry can never be both an ACSP and an ACIP.  The
   corresponding values can therefore never be present simultaneously in
   the administrativeRole attribute.

Each entry necessarily falls within one and only one ACSA.  Each such
   entry may also fall within one or more ACIAs nested inside the ACSA
   containing the entry.

An ACSP or ACIP has zero, one or more subentries that contain Access
   Control Information (ACI).

4.  Access Control Scheme Indication

The access control scheme (e.g., Basic Access Control [BAC]) in force
   in an ACSA is indicated by the accessControlScheme operational
   attribute contained in the administrative entry for the relevant
   ACSP.

The LDAP description [RFC2252] for the accessControlScheme
   operational attribute is:

( 2.5.24.1 NAME 'accessControlScheme'
          EQUALITY objectIdentifierMatch
          SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38
          SINGLE-VALUE USAGE directoryOperation )

An access control scheme conforming to the access control framework
   described in this document MUST define a distinct OBJECT IDENTIFIER

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 3]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

value to identify it through the accessControlScheme attribute.
   Object Identifier Descriptors for access control scheme identifiers
   may be registered with IANA [BCP64].

Only administrative entries for ACSPs are permitted to contain an
   accessControlScheme attribute.  If the accessControlScheme attribute
   is absent from a given ACSP, the access control scheme in force in
   the corresponding ACSA, and its effect on operations, results and
   errors, is implementation defined.

Any entry or subentry in an ACSA is permitted to contain ACI if and
   only if such ACI is permitted by, and consistent with, the access
   control scheme identified by the value of the accessControlScheme
   attribute of the ACSP.

5.  Access Control Information

There are three categories of Access Control Information (ACI):
   entry, subentry and prescriptive.

Entry ACI applies to only the entry or subentry in which it appears,
   and the contents thereof.  Subject to the access control scheme, any
   entry or subentry MAY hold entry ACI.

Subentry ACI applies to only the subentries of the administrative
   entry in which it appears.  Subject to the access control scheme, any
   administrative entry, for any aspect of administration, MAY hold
   subentry ACI.

Prescriptive ACI applies to all the entries within a subtree or
   subtree refinement of an administrative area (either an ACSA or an
   ACIA), as defined by the subtreeSpecification attribute of the
   subentry in which it appears.  Prescriptive ACI is only permitted in
   subentries of an ACSP or ACIP.  Prescriptive ACI in the subentries of
   a particular administrative point never applies to the same or any
   other subentry of that administrative point, but does apply to the
   subentries of subordinate administrative points, where those
   subentries are within the subtree or subtree refinement.

6.  Access Control Subentries

Each subentry which contains prescriptive ACI MUST have
   accessControlSubentry as a value of its objectClass attribute.  Such
   a subentry is called an access control subentry.

The LDAP description [RFC2252] for the accessControlSubentry
   auxiliary object class is:

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 4]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

( 2.5.17.1 NAME 'accessControlSubentry' AUXILIARY )

A subentry of this object class MUST contain at least one
   prescriptive ACI attribute of a type consistent with the value of the
   accessControlScheme attribute of the corresponding ACSP.

The subtree or subtree refinement for an access control subentry is
   termed a Directory Access Control Domain (DACD).  A DACD can contain
   zero entries, and can encompass entries that have not yet been added
   to the DIT, but does not extend beyond the scope of the ACSA or ACIA
   with which it is associated.

Since a subtreeSpecification may define a subtree refinement, DACDs
   within a given ACSA may arbitrarily overlap.

7.  Applicable Access Control Information

Although particular items of ACI may specify attributes or values as
   the protected items, ACI is logically associated with entries.

The ACI that is considered in access control decisions regarding an
   entry includes:

(1) Entry ACI from that particular entry.

(2) Prescriptive ACI from access control subentries whose DACDs
       contain the entry.  Each of these access control subentries is
       necessarily either a subordinate of the ACSP for the ACSA
       containing the entry, or a subordinate of the ACIP for an ACIA
       that contains the entry.

The ACI that is considered in access control decisions regarding a
   subentry includes:

(1) Entry ACI from that particular subentry.

(2) Prescriptive ACI from access control subentries whose DACDs
       contain the subentry, excluding those belonging to the same
       administrative point as the subentry for which the decision is
       being made.

(3) Subentry ACI from the administrative point associated with the
       subentry.

8.  Security Considerations

This document defines a framework for employing an access control
   scheme, i.e., the means by which access to directory information and

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 5]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

potentially to access rights themselves may be controlled, but does
   not itself define any particular access control scheme.  The degree
   of protection provided, and any security risks, are determined by the
   provisions of the access control schemes (defined elsewhere) making
   use of this framework.

Security considerations that apply to directory administration in
   general [ADMIN] also apply to access control administration.

9.  Acknowledgements

This document is derived from, and duplicates substantial portions
   of, Sections 4 and 8 of X.501 [X501].

10.  IANA Considerations

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is requested to update
   the LDAP descriptors registry [BCP64] as indicated by the following
   templates:

Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
      Descriptor (short name): accessControlScheme
      Object Identifier: 2.5.24.1
      Person & email address to contact for further information:
        Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
      Usage: attribute type
      Specification: RFC XXXX
      Author/Change Controller: IESG

Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration
      Descriptor (short name): accessControlSubentry
      Object Identifier: 2.5.17.1
      Person & email address to contact for further information:
        Steven Legg <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
      Usage: object class
      Specification: RFC XXXX
      Author/Change Controller: IESG

11.  References

11.1.  Normative References

[RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

[RFC2252]  Wahl, M., Coulbeck, A., Howes, T. and S. Kille,
              "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (v3): Attribute
              Syntax Definitions", RFC 2252, December 1997.

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 6]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

[RFC3377]  Hodges, J. and R. Morgan, "Lightweight Directory Access
              Protocol (v3): Technical Specification", RFC 3377,
              September 2002.

[BCP64]    Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA
              Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access
              Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 3383, September 2002.

[SUBENTRY] Zeilenga, K. and S. Legg, "Subentries in the Lightweight
              Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", RFC 3672, December
              2003.

[ADMIN]    Legg, S., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
              Directory Administrative Model",
              draft-legg-ldap-admin-xx.txt, a work in progress, June
              2004.

11.2.  Informative References

[COLLECT]  Zeilenga, K., "Collective Attributes in the Lightweight
              Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", RFC 3671, December
              2003.

[BAC]      Legg, S., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
              Basic and Simplified Access Control",
              draft-legg-ldap-acm-bac-xx.txt, a work in progress, June
              2004.

[X501]     ITU-T Recommendation X.501 (02/01) | ISO/IEC 9594-2:2001,
              Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
              The Directory: Models

Author's Address

Steven Legg
   Adacel Technologies Ltd.
   250 Bay Street
   Brighton, Victoria 3186
   AUSTRALIA

Phone: +61 3 8530 7710
     Fax: +61 3 8530 7888
   EMail: steven.legg@adacel.com.au

Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004).  This document is subject
   to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 7]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.

This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Changes in Draft 01

Section 4 has been extracted to become a separate Internet draft,
   draft-legg-ldap-admin-00.txt.  The subsections of Section 5 have
   become the new Sections 3 to 7.  Editorial changes have been made to
   accommodate this split.  No technical changes have been introduced.

Changes in Draft 02

RFC 3377 replaces RFC 2251 as the reference for LDAP.

An IANA Considerations section has been added.

Changes in Draft 03

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 8]

INTERNET-DRAFT        Access Control Administration        June 16, 2004

The document has been reformatted in line with current practice.

Legg                    Expires 16 December 2004                [Page 9]

${this.title}

Code Editor : draft-legg-ldap-acm-admin-xx.txt